Dismissed 4 Less

If you’ve recently received a traffic ticket in the state of California, you may be wondering what your next steps should be. Don’t worry – you’re not alone. Thousands of people receive traffic tickets every day in California, and many of them don’t know how to fight them. In this blog post, we’ll provide some tips from an expert on how to beat a California traffic ticket. Keep reading for more information!

If you’re planning on contesting your traffic ticket, the first step is to request a hearing with the court. You can do this by mail or in person, but we recommend doing it in writing so that you can have all of your documents in order. Once you’ve requested a hearing, the next step is to start gathering evidence. This may include witnesses, photos, or anything else that can help prove your innocence.

If you’re not sure how to go about gathering evidence, don’t worry – there are plenty of resources available to help you out. The best way to find out what type of evidence will be most helpful in your case is to speak with an expert who specializes in traffic law. They’ll be able to give you specific advice based on the facts of your case.

Once you have all of your evidence gathered, the next step is to start preparing your argument. Again, an expert can help you with this if you’re not sure where to start. Once you have everything ready, it’s time for your hearing.

At the hearing, you’ll present your evidence and argument to the judge. If they agree with you, then your ticket will be dismissed and you won’t have to pay any fines.

While there’s no guarantee that you’ll win your case, following these tips from an expert will give you the best chance at beating a California traffic ticket.

California traffic tickets can be expensive and time-consuming, but there are ways to beat them. With a little effort, you can have your ticket dismissed and save yourself from having to pay any fines. Follow these tips from an expert and you’ll be on your way to beating your California traffic ticket.

California Traffic Ticket Tips

If you’ve been issued a California traffic ticket, you may be able to have your case heard by a judge. This is commonly known as requesting a “trial by written declaration.” While this may sound like a complex legal procedure, it’s actually relatively simple and can be done entirely by mail. In most cases, you’ll simply need to fill out a few forms and send them to the court.

Once your forms are received, the court will review your case and make a decision. If the judge finds that there is sufficient evidence to convict you of the violation, they will issue a conviction and impose a fine.

However, if the judge finds that there is not enough evidence to convict you, they will dismiss the case. In either event, you will have the opportunity to appeal the decision if you feel that it was unfair.Requesting a trial by written declaration is a great way to resolve your California traffic ticket without having to appear in court.

If you choose this option, be sure to follow all of the instructions carefully and submit your forms on time. Doing so will give you the best chance of getting a favorable outcome.

How to Request a Hearing

If you have received a California traffic ticket, you may be able to have your case heard in court. This is commonly referred to as a “trial by declaration.” To request a hearing, you must do so within 10 days of the scheduled due date. You will need to fill out the appropriate forms (TR-205) and submit them to the court.

If the court grants your request, you will be notified of the date and time of your hearing. At the hearing, you will have the opportunity to present your case in writing and argue why you believe you should not be found guilty of the violation. The hearing officer will then make a decision and mail the decision directly to your address.

Please note that if you do not request a hearing 10 days before your due date, you can automatically be found guilty of the violation and will be required to pay the fine.

How to Gather Evidence

If you plan to fight a California traffic ticket, it’s important to gather evidence that will support your case. The best way to do this is to take pictures of the scene where the ticket was issued. Try to get a wide shot that shows the road, signage, and any other relevant details.

If there are witnesses who saw what happened, get their contact information so you can speak with them later. It’s also a good idea to make your own notes about what happened, including the date, time, and location. This will help you remember the details when you have to tell your side of the story. By taking the time to gather evidence, you can give yourself the best chance of winning your case.

How to Prepare Your Argument

If you have been issued a California traffic ticket, you may be feeling a bit overwhelmed. After all, it can be difficult to know how to prepare your argument and present your case in court. However, there are a few key things that you can do to increase your chances of success.

First, it is important to understand the charges against you and the potential consequences of a conviction. This will help you to determine what kind of defense you will need to mount. Next, you should gather evidence and witnesses that can support your version of events. Finally, it is crucial to present your argument in a clear and concise manner. By taking the time to prepare ahead of time, you can give yourself the best possible chance of winning your case.

With these California traffic ticket tips, you’ll be on your way to beating your ticket and keeping your driving record clean. Remember, it’s important to act quickly and gather evidence to support your case. By taking the time to prepare, you can increase your chances of success. Good luck!

If you have been issued a California traffic ticket, follow these tips from an expert to beat the charges. Request a trial by written declaration within ten days of receiving the ticket in order to avoid having to appear in court. Gather evidence such as pictures and witness statements that support your innocence. Finally, present your argument in a clear and concise manner when speaking with the hearing officer. With these steps, you’ll be on your way to beating your California traffic ticket.

If you have been issued a California traffic ticket, follow these tips from an expert to beat the charges:

• Request a trial by written declaration within ten days of receiving the ticket in order to avoid having to appear in court
• Gather evidence such as pictures and witness statements that support your innocence
• Present your argument in a clear and concise manner when speaking with the hearing officer

By following these steps, you’ll be on your way to beating your California traffic ticket. When it comes to California traffic tickets, it’s important to know your rights and options. If you’ve been issued a ticket, you can always request a trial by written declaration.

What to expect when using a trial by written declaration

In California, most traffic tickets can be handled by what is called “trial by written declaration.” This means that you do not have to appear in court and instead, you can contest the ticket by mailing in certain documents.

The upside of this is that it is convenient and you do not have to take off work or school to attend court. The downside is that it is more difficult to win your case without being able to speak to the judge in person. If you decide to go this route, you will need to fill out a document called an “affidavit,” which is basically your statement about why you are not guilty of the infraction.

You will also need to include any evidence that you have (photos, witnesses, etc.). Once you have mailed in your documents, the prosecutor will review them and decide whether or not to dismiss the case. If the prosecutor does not dismiss the case, then you will be given a date for a trial by written declaration. At this trial, both you and the prosecutor will submit your written statements and evidence to a judge, who will then make a decision about whether or not you are guilty. While trial by written declaration is not ideal, it is still a good option if you cannot make it to court.

How to Win Your Case using Trial by Written Declaration

In California, if you receive a traffic ticket, you have the option of contesting the ticket by written declaration instead of going to court. If you choose to contest your ticket by written declaration, you will need to submit a request form to the court, along with your declaration and any evidence you wish to submit. The court will then review your case and render a decision. While there is no guarantee that you will win your case using this method, it is often an effective way to contest a California traffic ticket. To give yourself the best chance of success, be sure to thoroughly research the traffic laws in California and present a well-reasoned argument in your declaration. With a little effort, you may find that contesting your traffic ticket by written declaration is an easy and effective way to beat the charges.

When it comes to California traffic tickets, it’s important to know your rights and options. And one of the best ways to beat a California traffic ticket is by contesting it using a trial by written declaration. With a little effort, you may find that this is an easy and effective way to beat the charges. So if you’ve been issued a California traffic ticket, don’t hesitate to contest it using a trial by written declaration.

When researching how to beat a California traffic ticket, you’ll likely come across the option of contesting the ticket via written declaration. While there is no guarantee of success when using this method, it often proves to be an effective way of beating California traffic tickets. In order to give yourself the best

If you’ve been issued a California traffic ticket, contesting it by written declaration may be the best way to win your case. This process involves submitting a request form to the court, along with your declaration and any evidence you wish to submit. The court will then review your case and render a decision. While there is no guarantee of success when using this method, it is often an effective way to beat California traffic tickets. So if you’re looking for a way to contest your California traffic ticket, don’t hesitate to try contesting it by written declaration.

In order to give yourself the best chance of success, be sure to thoroughly research the traffic laws in California and present a well-reasoned argument in your declaration cited specific vehicle codes and your individual circumstances.

We are the experts in this field and can dismiss your violation. Give us a call or send over your violation for a free ticket review.

When you are driving down the highway and the posted speed limit is 65 mph, but the flow of traffic is closer to 75 mph, does that mean majority of people on the highway is speeding? Many people don’t know the basic rule and guidelines relating to speeding. The basic rule of speeding is outlined in California Vehicle Code Section 22350.

The basic speed law that is found in the California Vehicle Code section 22350 states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property”.

This basic speed law is very broad and vague and doesn’t tell you a definite answer to the question of what truly constitutes speeding. Although, it is vague many cases of precedent have determined that it isn’t so vague and uncertain to make it constitutionally invalid. However, the vagueness of the basic speed law was probably done purposely because the intent behind the basic speed law is primarily to regulate the conduct of vehicle operators who are bound to know conditions that dictate speeds at which they can drive with a reasonable amount of safety or should know their cars and their own ability to handle them, and especially their ability to come to stop at different speeds and under different conditions of surface of highway (Wilding v. Norton).

Interesting enough, any speed can constitute speeding. In Finnegan v. Giffen the court determined that any speed beyond what is reasonable and proper with due regard to safety under existing conditions is lawful and speeding can even occur when it is less than the posted speed limit.

Some of the factors that are looked to when determining if the basic speed law is violated are the number and speed of other vehicles on the road, what the road surface is, if there is a presence of bicyclists, presence of pedestrians, presence of animals, if a school is nearby and what the current weather. If there is heavy traffic then you must drive slower in order to drive safely and abide by the basic speed law.

Similarly, if the current weather condition is poor then you also must reduce your speed. However, if you drive too slow you can also be in violation because you will be blocking the normal and reasonable movement of traffic which can also be just as dangerous as speeding. It is important to drive a reasonable rate of speed given the current conditions of the road. Beyond the basic speed law there are other speed laws such as absolute speed limits and prima face limits.

For example, California Vehicle Code 22356 states “no person shall drive a vehicle upon that highway at a speed greater than 70 miles per hour” when posted. These absolute speed limit laws make it automatically considered that someone is speeding and in violation of the California Vehicle Code when they are driving faster than the limits and the California basic speed law apply. There are also “Prima facie” speed limits outlined in California Vehicle Code which are basically presumed speed limits that motorists are expected to know. For example, a prima facie speed limit of 15 mph at railroad crossings and 25 miles per hour in residential areas and school zones.

A violation of prima facie speed limits can use the basic speed law to argue that the speed limit he was traveling was safe and reasonable under those given circumstances. However, if it can’t be effectively argued then the driver will be in violation of the prima facie speed limit violation.

If someone is found to be in violation of California Vehicle Code Section 22350 there are a few different possible consequences. Violating the basic speed law is a infraction and a person found guilty of violating the basic speed law can face a fine, points on your driving record, and in some cases suspension of driver’s license, and being held liable for any negligence case as a result of any auto accidents.

The fine for violation of California vehicle code section 22350 is $234 when the driver exceeds the speed limit by 1 to 15 mph. The basic speed law can be applied in conjunction with other California Vehicle Code sections such as reckless driving and the minimum speed law. An increase in insurance premiums can also occur when someone is found to have violated the basic speed law. Any traffic violation, including a violation of the basic speed law, can be challenged in court and if there is any question regarding the validity of violation an attorney should be consulted.

The amount a speeding ticket will cost you in the State of California will depend on a few different factors. First, how fast you were going will impact the amount of the speeding ticket. In addition, if you were in a construction or school zone. If you are a repeat offender will also impact the amount of the fines. The amount of a speeding ticket may also depend on where you were caught speeding.

The base fee for a speeding ticket is usually within the range of $35-$200 and is dependent on how fast you were going. However, many other fees can also be added to the base rate including a surcharge and assessment fees. Assessment fees include court operations assessment fee, conviction assessment fee, state penalty assessment (base fine), night court assessment fee, county penalty assessment fee, and emergency medical services assessment fees. As a result, a speeding ticket with a $35 base fee can easily come to a total of $710 once everything is added.

California Vehicle Code Section 22348 states a person who drives a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 100 miles per hour is guilty of an infraction punishable by of a fine of not to exceed 500 dollars if it is the individual’s first conviction of a violation of this subdivision. However, if an offense occurred within three years of a prior offense resulting in a conviction of an offense der this subdivision a fine of not to exceed 750 dollars will be imposed. Now if an offense that occurred within five years of two or more prior offenses resulting in convictions of offenses under this subdivision will result in a fine not to exceed 1000 dollars. In addition, the person’s privilege to operate a motor vehicle will be suspended due to repeat offenses.

Another factor that will influence the punishment of a speeding ticket is if a person is in violation of California Vehicle Code section 23109. This section states a person shall not engage in a motor vehicle speed contest which means a motor vehicle race against another vehicle, a clock, or other timing device. A person conviction of this violation of this subdivision they can be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not less than 24 hours nor more than 90 days or by a fine of not less than $355 nor more than $1000 or by both that fine and imprisonment. They also will be required to perform 40 hours of community service and their privilege to operate a motor vehicle may be suspended for 90 days to six months.

California Vehicle Code section 42000.5 also takes into account if an individual was speeding while operating a bus, motor trick or truck tractor. It states every person conviction of an speeding infraction while operating a bus, motor truck, or truck tractor having three or more axles or any motor truck or truck tractor drawing any other vehicle shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $100 for a first conviction, except that if the person has exceeded the specified speed limit by 10 mph or more, the fine shall not exceed $200 for a first conviction, and not exceeding $300 for a second or subsequent conviction.

Another expense that a speeding ticket may cost you is the increase of your insurance premiums. A single speeding ticket can increase your insurance rates by 34% and multiple offenses will continue to increase your insurance rates. If you are convicted of a speeding ticket for going 15 mph over the limit you can easily find yourself paying an increase of $150 per year on average in increased insurance costs.

If you are convicted of exceeding the speed limit of more than 15 mph then you are likely to see your insurance costs to go even higher. In addition, since speeding tickets have the potential of adding points to your driving record among the other consequences discussed throughout this article, many people take advantage of the opportunity to take traffic school to avoid having the points added to their record. Traffic school isn’t an opportunity for everyone since you must be deemed eligible.

In general, those who hold a valid non-commercial California’s driver’s license, have been cited for a minor moving violation (not exceeding 25 MPH over the limit), and have not taken traffic school in the past 18 months will be deemed eligible for traffic school. However, traffic school is yet another cost that will be added to the financial burden you will bare after receiving a speeding ticket. Traffic school is another fee that has to be paid on top of the fee of the ticket itself. You must pay state-mandated, non-refundable administration fee of $52 to be eligible for traffic school and then pay the additional cost of the traffic school course itself.

Speeding tickets are a hefty cost and can cost you even more beyond the initial cost of the speeding ticket itself. As a result, if you think there is a question to the validity of a speeding ticket you received then you should consult with an attorney and get legal advice on challenging the ticket. By challenging a traffic ticket, you may be able to get the ticket dismissed along with any financial burdens that come along with it.

California is known for its wonderful beaches, Hollywood, Wine, Disneyland and many other great things but it is also may be known for another not so great thing. It may be known by many for what is called the “California Stop” or the “California Roll”. A California stop is normally brought up with a negative connotation, but what exactly a California stop is and what are the rules surrounding it will be discussed in this article.

A California stop occurs when a driver treats a stop sign as a yield sign and thus never comes to a complete stop but instead slows down and then keeps on rolling through. Despite being commonly known that many Californians do this doesn’t mean it is justifiable or legal to do so. The California Vehicle Code section 22450 states “The driver of any vehicle approaching a stop sign at the entrance to, or within, an intersection shall stop at a limit line, if marked, otherwise before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection. If there is no limit line or cross walk, the driver shall stop at the entrance to the intersecting roadway”. However, this section doesn’t define what is considered a “stop”.

A complete stop occurs when the speed is at zero and the vehicle isn’t moving forward at all. There is no set time frame outlined in the California Vehicle Code, however, many people use the “three-second rule” to ensure they have in fact came to a complete stop. If a driver doesn’t come to a complete stop but instead just slows to their speed then proceeds through the stop sign is running the stop sign and doing what is referred to as a “California stop”.

Yielding is not permissible to do in place of coming to a complete stop but may be required in conjunction with coming to a complete stop as outlined in California Vehicle Code section 21802. California Vehicle Code section 21802 states “The driver of any vehicle approaching a stop sign at the entrance to, or within, an intersection shall stop as required by Section 22450. The driver shall then yield the right-of-way to any vehicles which have approached from another highway, or which are approaching so closely as to constitute an immediate hazard, and shall continue to yield the right-of-way to those vehicles until he or she can proceed when reasonable safety….this section does not apply where stop signs are erected upon all approaches to an intersection”.

When someone commits a “California stop” they are violating California Vehicle code section 22450 which is an infraction and can receive a ticket of about $238 and a possibly a point on their driving record with the DMV which can result in increased insurance rates. Traffic school is an option for those individuals who qualify to complete it and is recommended to avoid having points added to your driving record. However, going to traffic school is an additional cost an individual must pay on top of the fine for the traffic ticket.

Receiving a ticket is never something anyone wants to happen since $238 is awfully expensive to save yourself a few seconds of time. Majority of people don’t think about challenging a violation of California Vehicle Code section 22450, let along consulting an attorney about such violation. However, there are some defenses which make challenging a violation possible. For example, the stop sign wasn’t visible at the time of the incident or present at all. The officer was wrong, and you did actually make a complete stop and he wrongfully cited you. Another defense is if the driver failed to come to a complete stop due to an emergency situation, it was unsafe to stop and necessary to roll through the stop sign to avoid a collision. In these instances, it may be worthwhile to consult with an attorney and determine if challenging the ticket is worth it based on all the facts and specific circumstances.

However, it is important to remember that having photos, videos, and other evidence to support the claims may be necessary to establish a strong defense in these types of cases.

However, the California stop may not be specifically about California after all. Many people say the same phrase but replaced with the state or area they live in. For example, some people say, “St. Louis Stop”, “New York Stop”, “Michigan Stop” or “New Orleans Stop”. So, it seems that treating stop signs casually and not coming to a complete stop is not something only Californians do but instead is done basically everywhere and the name of the rolling stop just changes based on the location you live in.

Over the years red light cameras have become more and more common. Red light cameras allow or automated enforcement to deter those individual’s who run red lights. Red light cameras work by using a sensor that is placed under the asphalt that is triggered when the sensor is activated by a car passes over it then triggers the camera to take photos.

The camera takes a photo of the vehicle’s license plate and a photo of the driver. Due to the multiple photos that are taken, it is common to see several flashes when you run a red light that is enforced by a red-light camera. A ticket is then mailed to the registered owner of the car. Many states have enacted specific legislation regarding red light cameras. Some states have made red light cameras illegal. However, in the state of California they are legal.

Many people argue that red light cameras should be illegal due to being unconstitutional. Some reasons behind this argument are that it violates the six amendment of the constitution and it is unconstitutional because the ticket is automatically issued to the owner without being certain the owner of the vehicle is the person driving the vehicle at the time of the offense and that since the “accuser” is a machine someone can’t confront the accessor in court which violates the confrontation clause.

Some states have moved forward with making red light cameras illegal such as Texas. In June 2019, Governor Greg Abbott signed a bill which banned red light cameras in the state of Texas. Arkansas, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wisconsin also prohibit the use of red-light cameras.

In the state of California, it has been ruled that red-light cameras are constitutional and legal. The use of red-light cameras is regulated by California Vehicle Code Section 21455.5. It states that red light cameras (automated traffic enforcement system) is permitted if certain requirements are met. First, a sign must be posted within 200 feet of an intersection where a system is operating. That sign also must clearly indicate the system’s presence and be visible to all traffic that is approaching. That means the signs must be visible to traffic approaching from all directions. However, if some directions aren’t subject to the red-light camera then signage is not required in those areas.

If the red-light camera is new and just implemented then the local jurisdiction must only issue warning notices for the first 30 days and provide a public announcement of the placement of the automated traffic enforcement system at least 30 days before the commencement of the enforcement program. Only a governmental agency in cooperation with a law enforcement agency may operate an automated traffic enforcement system. No third parties that aren’t a government agency may operate a red-light camera. The governmental agency must develop uniform guidelines for screening, issuing violations, and processing and storing confidential information. The photographic records made by an automated traffic enforcement system shall be confidential and not be made available to a third party and should only be made available to governmental agencies and law enforcement agencies for the purposes of California Vehicle Code Section 21455.5.

The confidential information obtained from the Department of Motor Vehicles for the administration or enforcement of this section should remain confidential and not be used for any other purpose. The confidential records and information can be retained for up to six months or until final disposition of the citation by then the information shall be destroyed to preserve the confidentiality. In addition, the governmental agency is required to regularly inspect the equipment to certify that it is properly installed and calibrated. They also must maintain the signage to ensure it meets the criteria discussed above and remains visible to approaching traffic. California Vehicle Code section 21455.5 also specifically states that a red light camera.

In California, the driver cited for a traffic violation is liable for the ticket, not the vehicle’s owner and this doesn’t change with red light camera violates despite the fact that the citation is mailed to the registered owner of the car. If the owner of the car is not the person who was driving the car at the time of violation then they should contact an attorney to challenge the citation.

Although, red light cameras are legal they are heavily regulated by the vehicle code section we just discussed and are challengeable under many different situations. There are numerous defenses surrounding red light camera violations. One possible challenge is if the images aren’t clear enough to make a proper identification of the driver or vehicle.

Sometimes poor image quality and poor weather conditions can make identification more difficult and give rise to challenging the citation. Another possible challenge is if the camera was working properly. The vehicle code requires that the automated traffic enforcement system be routinely maintained, properly installed, and calibrated and if there is evidence that shows this wasn’t the case and that the red-light camera wasn’t working correctly on the day of the violation then the citation can be challenged. In closing, although red-light cameras have been deemed constitutional and legal doesn’t mean they can’t be challenged in court.